Blog FPO

Coaches…Can You Define Trust?

two women sitting at table talking

This guest blog post is by Michael Reed, Principal at Bloch & Reed LLC

If you ask 100 coaches to define the word trust, you will likely find almost as many answers. Certainly, common themes would emerge as they described what trust means to them, or how they build trust with their coaching clients, or the importance of trustworthiness. Trust researchers have struggled for decades trying to define a concept that changes depending on context. Trust is a vital element of the relationship between people, a core component of a well-functioning team, the cornerstone of an organizational brand promise, and even a belief that society can have about its institutions.

At the heart of many definitions of trust is the ability to demonstrate a shared vulnerability that allows individuals to co-create an experience grounded in mutual respect.

Coaches work in the same space that trust does. Interpersonal trust works to reduce friction, to get people and ideas unstuck, to keep things moving. Team trust fosters open communication, collaboration, goal attainment, and ultimately innovation. Organizational trust is created and sustained through the public’s beliefs about the consistency between a company’s espoused values and the way the organization engages the world. 

Given the importance of trust in our coaching relationships, it might be helpful to reflect on the ways we can leverage trust to improve our coaching practice.

Establish Trust in the Process…Until it’s Personal

  • Are the processes for onboarding a new client consistent with my marketing and brand?
  • Do clients see my contracting process as an opportunity to clarify joint expectations and ensure that they are heard?
  • Do clients perceive our initial interactions to be logical, consistent, and predictable.

At the start of the relationship, things may feel transactional until a bond begins to form. That’s okay, those transactions form the foundation for the future.

Building Trust in the Journey

  • Do I model vulnerability appropriately? Many clients need to have vulnerability demonstrated before they can reciprocate.
  • As the relationship deepens, do I create a safe space for the client to explore derailing behaviors and vulnerabilities, as well as strategies for leveraging strengths.
  • Do my energy and nonverbals communicate my support for the client and their ownership of the journey?

Repairing Trust. Let’s practice authentic apologies!

A trust violation occurs when an outcome does not meet the expectations of the other party. The violation can be an unmet expectation by either the coach or the client, a miscommunication, or even a false narrative we’ve created that does not exist in any reality. Regardless of the cause of the trust violation, everyone needs to know how to apologize and reset the relationship. Researchers have identified several elements of a successful apology.

A statement of regret. “I’m so sorry…”
Explanation of why. “I was thinking of what I needed at the moment and not what may have been important to you.”
Taking responsibility. “This is my fault, and I’ll do better if faced with a similar situation again.”
A promise to not repeat the same violation.
Offer of repair. “Is there anything I can do?”
Authentic request for forgiveness. I hope that you can excuse me. I know that it may take some time, but I’m ready to talk about it when you are.”

Many of these apology steps are smaller promises – that when kept form the basis for a stronger relationship. Of course, all of us can imagine scenarios where these promises were not kept, and another trust violation occurred. Apologies work best when the trust violation was a matter of competence -- not a matter of a lack of integrity.

If we can demonstrate competence, caring and integrity in our coaching relationships, we can deliver transformational experiences for our clients. It all starts with small transactions, co-creating a path to a successful outcome, and being willing to repair trust when things don’t go as planned. If we can model trusting relationships with our clients, they can carry that trust into the world, we’ll all feel a bit more trusting – and a shared definition won’t matter at all!

---
Image retrieved from Pexels.com

Partner Spotlight: The Image Shoppe

The Image Shoppe is a brand and digital marketing agency that provides the following services: brand marketing, digital strategy, design, copywriting, web development and fractional CMO.

Read More >

Partner Spotlight: Scott Oser Associates

Scott Oser Associates assists associations with recruiting, retaining and engaging members.  Additionally, they help them reach their marketing goals across all areas of their business.  They also serve as the revenue generating arm of an association for advertising, exhibits, sponsorship and partnership sales. Finally, they can help associations reach their audiences via phone.

Read More >
By: Aaron Wolowiec | May, 28 2021
Coaching

Coaching Questions Guaranteed to Get Your Team Talking

The Event Garde team has come to rely on well-researched models to support its internal work and collaboration among fellow team members, as well as its external work, relationships and deliverables with clients and other key stakeholders. In this post, Aaron Wolowiec shares three of these models and the associated coaching questions used to elicit productive discussion.

Read More >

The Long-Term Problem of Short-Term Actions

If you face a problem that requires fast action, what took you so long to recognize and be prepared to act in your and the businesses long-term interests? Are we practicing to solve problems only for today and not the future? Let's not create more potholes to fill by not seeing and understanding their long-term impact.

Read More >

Coaches…Can You Define Trust?

Coaches often say that trust is the key to their coaching success, but the term itself defies a universal definition. This post suggest three areas where we can leverage trust to strengthen our coaching practice.

Read More >

Great Leaders Coach or Risk Cheating Team Development

There is often a difference between how we are leading and how we would prefer to be leading – not to mention the impact on our teams and our organizations. There can also be a difference between how people are being led and how they would like to contribute and develop their long-term career potential. When we choose to eliminate the risk of cheating our team’s development by using a coaching approach as leaders, the effort creates a magnitude of impact for our organizations, our teams, and our own leadership that becomes irresistible.

Read More >